Indo-Pacific is as much our past as it is our future: Jaishankar
   Date :05-Sep-2019
 
 
Male : A DAY after External Affairs Minister (EAM) S Jaishankar said that Indo-Pacific is one of the logical steps after ‘Act East Policy’ for India, he asserted on Wednesday that the Indo-Pacific is as much India’s past as it is the future of the country. “The Indo-Pacific is as much our past as it is our future and it must be perceived as a further extrapolation of our Act East-Look East policy,” Indian Mission in the Maldives wrote on Twitter. Earlier on Tuesday, Jaishankar while addressing the two-day Indian Ocean Conference hosted by the Maldives said that the Indo-Pacific is one of the logical steps after ‘Act East Policy’ for India.
 
“The Indo-pacific is not tomorrow’s forecast, but yesterday’s reality. The Indo-Pacific naturally means different things to different powers, but it is undeniably a priority for all of them. For India, it is the logical step after Act East and a break out from the confines of South Asia,” he said. “For Japan, the movement into the Indian Ocean is the key to its strategic normalisation. For the United States, a unified theatre, aggressive burden-sharing requirements and the stakes are high for China as well because its naval capabilities are indeed a prerequisite to its emergence as a global power.
 
The ASEAN is the latest to make its move in this regard and it has tabled an approach on the Indo-Pacific as well,” he continued. “What we can no longer doubt that this is unquestionably the era for the contemporary version of the Great Game where multiple players with diverse ambitions display their strategic skills,” the Minister said. “The Indo-Pacific may be a fashion as a strategic concept right now, but the fact is it has been an economic and cultural reality for centuries. After all, Indians and Arabs have left their imprint all the way up to the eastern coast of China. In fact, this reality is not remote at all and the seamlessness of waters only sharpens the appetite of western powers who enter it,” he added.
 
“The British empire operated its own version of the Indo-Pacific even if it was not free or open. Its visualisation of both resources and interests was a cross integrated zone explaining many of the events of the 19th and 20th century. Other powers, in turn, followed the approach of the dominant one. If Indian troops fought in the Boxer Rebellion of 1901, the Japanese marines too intervened in Singapore in 1950. And not least it was the enormous logistical effort from India by the Anglo-American alliance that sustained China in its war against Japan after 1942,” the EAM said.