US Curbs On Venezuela
   Date :18-Feb-2021

US_1  H x W: 0
 
By MISION VERDAD :

The United States has a history of using “humanitarian aid” as a weapon of war against the Bolivarian Republic and unscrupulous financing of the Venezuelan Opposition.
 
ON JANUARY 28, a group of U.S. Congressmen, led by former Green Beret and now Republican Party legislator, Michael Waltz, introduced into the Congress a new Bill dedicated to smashing democracy in Venezuela, cumbersomely entitled the “Bipartisan Banning Operations and Leases with Illegitimate Authoritarian Regime (BOLIVAR) Act.”
 
The creators of the law tendentiously established the contradictory acronym, “BOLIVAR Act,” cynically using the name of a freedom fighter for a Bill dedicated to anything but freedom and democracy. The precedent for this undemocratic measure dates back to 2019, when GOP Sen. Rick Scott, obsessive opponent of the freely elected Venezuelan Government since his years as Governor of Florida, sponsored, together with Sen. Marco Rubio and Waltz himself, the Venezuelan Restriction on Contracting Act, which at that time did not even pass a committee vote to be taken up by the full Congress. Scott is one of the most active operators in the anti-Venezuelan lobby, a character who has led the charge in the U.S. to intensify the unilateral coercive measures against Venezuela. He has been assisted by Rubio. The focus of the new mutation of the title in the bill (“Contracting Restriction”) alludes to another operation of the well-known plan to make impossible the financial transactions of the Venezuelan State with any entity, subject, or company prominent in international trade.
 
According to the document, the purpose is to prohibit the President of the U.S. Government from granting contracts to persons who have any commercial operations with the “Maduro regime.” At a time when the world watches the Senate trial of a former President who tried to destroy democracy in America, the proponents of this Bill try to use U.S. policy to destroy democracy in Venezuela and elsewhere. Most of the U.S. Congressmen in the House of Representatives who are pushing the legislative proposal against Venezuela represent Florida districts where they hope to garner support from right-wing elements in the Venezuelan and Cuban communities. As is typical for right-wing politicians in the U.S. who promote anti-communism in order to further their own goals, Rick Scott has an impressive list of his own criminal inclinations.
 
Scott is implicated in the largest Medicare fraud in the United States when he was CEO of the health care company Columbia/Hospital Corporation of America (HCA). That controversial matter gravitated to the FBI investigation, later made public in 1997, in which the company in question admitted to felony billing and fraudulent practices three years later. Most of these events occurred under Scott’s leadership. According to ‘Sun Sentinel’ columnist Randy Schultz, Columbia/HCA gave kickbacks to doctors to refer patients to make them look sicker than they were, so Medicare would pay more. With his false concern for the people of Venezuela and a questionable track record, Scott used the Fifth Amendment 75 times in order to avoid testifying in the case and he walked away with $300 million in stock and a $5.1 million severance pay. The United States has a history of using “humanitarian aid” as a weapon of war against the Bolivarian Republic and unscrupulous financing of the Venezuelan Opposition. The Bill allows certain types of “aid” to Venezuela, as long as that “aid” serves to undercut the democratically elected Government there. Under the guise of “humanitarian aid,” the U.S.
 
Government through agencies such as the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has channeled funding to the Venezuelan anti-Chávez leadership in order to stimulate the strategy of “regime change” in Venezuela. Some of this “aid” was given to criminal right-wing activists, among them Julio Borges, Carlos Vecchio, and Lilian Tintori in September of 2019, admitted by Mark Green, director of the agency pic.twitter.com/mb0iMWTFQG. The #USAID reported that it has delivered $654 million to the Opposition #Venezuela Government to overthrow it. On the other hand, and in light of what characterises the proposed Bolivar Act, when mention is made of “business operations,” it refers to engaging in commerce in any form, including the acquisition, development, maintenance, possession, sale, lease, or operation of equipment, facilities, personnel, products, services, personal property, real property, or any other apparatus of business or commerce. Based on this, it is evident, that oil and service companies internationally are being pressured to cut all connections with the State owned Venezuelan oil industry whose profits are used to improve social conditions in that country.
 
The result of passage of the Bolivar Act would be to further strangle the democratically- elected Government of President Maduro. The Bill forces international companies to choose whether to do business with Venezuela or with the oil companies of the United States. The Bill forbids all commerce including acquisition of drugs, medical supplies, and, in the midst of the pandemic even vaccines. Not to mention the food sector where the same premise applies. Companies must decide between doing business with the United States or with Venezuela. In practice, the U.S. Government has prevented imports in the food and pharmaceutical sectors by the Venezuelan State through executive orders. Through the “BOLIVAR Act,” it intends to make this official. The idea is to legally impose untold suffering on the Venezuelan people for exercising their right to choose their own Government. Trump’s far Right Government is gone and from January 29, the Democratic Biden presidency has taken over. But the old policy on Latin America is continuing and the Right wingers have a field day in proposing measures against the duly elected Governments. It is time the Biden administration gives a relook at its Latin American policy and restrains its Congressmen from following old pro-imperialist policies. (IPA)