By RAHUL DIXIT :
The raging debate
needs to be seen from
all angles. AI is
definitely a supremely
handy tool for people.
But it cannot be an
alternative to human
skills, brain, or
creativity. A calibrated
use of AI is advised for
countries like India
which is listening to
the debate with keen
interest and at the
same time silently
building its own
AI models.
Nine people were killed and
dozens injured after an 18-yearold opened fire at a school in western Canada. The shooter had first
killed a woman and half-brother
at home and then targeted Tumbler
Ridge Secondary School using a
modified rifle and long gun.A lawsuit has been filed in San Francisco
against OpenAI and its CEO Sam
Altman.
Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates
has warned that Artificial
Intelligence (AI) could drive events
causing one billion deaths, as a
sharp debate emerged in
Washington over whether
Governments should regulate
advanced AI.
F
ROM the brag of AI
defining the future, the
talk has swiftly shifted
to going slow on the
technological marvel.
The world of Artificial Intelligence
is now talking about the catastrophic effects it can unleash on
humans if the race for advanced
AI models zooms without necessary checks. Alarms are being
sounded on the dark side of technology by the same people who
offered it to the world with a promise to change their future.
Despite conspiracy theories
floated by rivals on this sudden
realisation in the American tech
giants, recent episodes in the AI
industry provide a glimpse into
what unrestrained technology can
do on its own. The mass shooting
in Canada was a result of the
teenager seeking help from
ChatGPT, discussing gun violence
and planning queries. The shooter’s account was flagged by
OpenAI but the police were not
alerted for months. It resulted in
a gory tragedy. Similarly, there
have been growing incidents of
AI agents acting beyond their
intended limits. All AI giants are
grappling with the modern bots
going rogue and breaching into
sensitive systems in various countries. The threat was flagged six
months ago and now it is going
out of control of even the makers.
This is the real danger we are talking about.
Tech companies are now
acknowledging the pitfalls of the
race for the most modern AI tool.
It has led to a rare unanimity
among top companies on slowing down the pace on the AI frontier. Anthropic chief Dario Amodei
has urged companies to pace
down the race to build powerful
AI. It found immediate response
from OpenAI’s Altman and Elon
Musk. Bill Gates chipped in with
his own warnings within days. It
was a rare truce among rivals and
its timing raised more questions
in their fiercest competitors in
China. Beijing has started crying
foul over the timing of the call
when Chinese President Xi Jinping
was meeting US President Donald
Trump in the White House.
Chinese analysts are now calling
the safety talk a ‘Cold War
Playbook’. Yet, geopolitical, trade
and tech rivalries apart, the alarm
on AI’s growing overreach cannot
be dismissed as mind-games
between two top powers.
The safety concerns are not
manufactured as a business ploy
to slow down the entire industry.
Suspicions can arise when a market leader asks everyone to slow
down and at the same time asks
the Government to choke the challenger’s supply of chips. But, the
slowdown comes with its own
costs. The talk of AI guardrails can
have a severe impact on
Anthropic’s proposed IPO where
the company aims to raise USD
100 billion. Despite betting big on
AI, the tech giant has now laid out
the catastrophic effects it can have
as a danger sign for investors. The
self-inflicted hit cannot be for the
sake of beating Chinese AI companies. The red-flags, therefore,
need to be taken at face value. The
powerful AI models can actually
disobey human commands and
escape secure environments. They
can wreak massive havoc on entire
humanity. The suggestion by Bill
Gates that rogue AI agents can
turn into human-slayers cannot
be brushed aside as fear-mongering.
The fear is shared by a growing
number of countries. Even China,
the most vehement pusher of AI
in every sphere of life, has a big
section acknowledging that the
advanced models can self-evolve
and go out of hand within the system. Beijing did try to swat the
fear aside with its governance
ideas in the World AI Conference
in Shanghai in July, but an international report of 2025 has got the
backing of over 30 countries warning that advanced AI can start
cyberattacks, bioterrorism and
even wars.
The raging debate needs to be
seen from all angles.
AI is definitely
a supremely handy tool for people. But it cannot be an alternative to human skills, brain, or creativity. A calibrated use of AI is
advised for countries like India
which is listening to the debate
with keen interest and at the same
time silently building its own AI
models. The IndiaAI Mission is
well on course of building capacities and controls of our own rather
than depending upon foreign systems. Though India is still a small
player in terms of money, the race
between US and China has proven
that it cannot be the only criteria
to determine the market leader.
Focus and talent form the core of
tech advancement and India has
both in copious quantities. It has
now got a timely warning on how
to use talent and skills to build AI
models based totally on indigenous literature, languages and
safety systems that keep a tight
human leash on technology. It will
need an open governance mechanism, access to cutting-edge tech
and total inclusion.
Machines cannot emerge as
masters of men and women. They
cannot act on their own by defying human commands. AI is a tool
in human hands; it cannot be
allowed to overpower our cognitive thinking. The rogue AI agents
have given India a loud and clear
message:- Don’t act in haste to
adopt AI as the only sign of the
future. Wait, watch, pause, think,
and then make it a companion,
not a master.