W
ORLD markets reacted with a surge, a typical trend
they show to anything that United States President
Mr. Donald Trump announces on a big crisis.
Countries directly affected by the West Asia war,
too, heaved a sigh of relief but with a cautious
optimism. The halt in US strikes on Iran’s power plants, announced
by Mr. Trump, has had its desired effect but it is as temporary
as a promise from the POTUS. The pause of five days has begun
with an eerie fear of another U-turn by all the parties involved
in the latest armed crisis the world has been subjected too. The
pause is fragile and the world knows it too well.
As is his wont, Mr. Trump again brought a deal in focus, claiming it as the desire of the Iranian leadership.
The claim has been
promptly refuted by Iran thus exposing the vulnerability of a
ceasefire announcement by Mr. Trump. Reports have suggested that there had been attacks on Iran’s energy sites in Isfahan
and Khorramshahr hours after Mr. Trump’s announcement of
a five-day halt. It aptly sums up the situation in West Asia where
the US is finding it extremely hard to wriggle out of a war it had
been forced into by a trigger-happy partner.
While there have been multiple claimants of becoming mediator between US and Iran, there are also signals of the war escalating further as there are no clear terms of negotiations. The
US simply had no goal for this war which, as evidence and circumstances suggest, Israel Prime Minister Mr. Benjamin
Netanyahu had wanted desperately to settle old scores with
Iran. The US has no roadmap to bring an end to this war and
Mr. Trump’s daily flip-flop with contrasting statements is further adding to the problem. In this light, the five-day pause on
attacks promised by Mr. Trump has to pass the test of trust.
Given his track record, at least during his second term in White
House, Mr. Trump can easily change the goalpost and come
back harder at Iran. It is still a fluid situation, though the world
has welcomed the tone-down in hostilities between the two
warring sides.
The actual assessment of the situation can be gauged from
the blockade of ships in the Strait of Hormuz. The Islamic
Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) have choked the waterway
with special concessions only to a few “friendly” countries. That
passage, too, comes at a cost decided by Iran. A large number
of vessels are still stranded near Hormuz gulf as the US continues to weigh its options, including a military strike on the IRGC
commands. So far, the threats have not yielded anything even
as Mr. Trump’s call to the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation
(NATO) countries was snubbed. In the end, the Strait of Hormuz
remains blocked and the major cause of the hostilities remains
unsolved. All the action around this issue can at the most be
termed as a desperate attempt to ensure status quo ante.
Mr. Trump’s turnaround appears to be a call to assuage growing opposition at home to his decision of entering the war. His
ratings have been gradually plummeting, first after the tariff
salvos at the world, its reversal by the US Supreme Court, and
now by the poorly-thought move to join forces with Israel to
attack Iran.
The war has significantly affected the American economy and people have now started to feel the heat. With the midterm elections round the corner, Mr. Trump might be wary of a
dent to his reputation among his MAGA (Make America Great
Again) voter base. The pause, if it holds, might help the confused US President an honourable exit from this mess of his
own creation.
However, much depends upon the terms of negotiations that
Iran will put forth if there is a deal. The resilience shown by Iran
has put it in a better place to make an agreement. It will be a
difficult exercise for Mr. Trump’s administration, which has a
habit of browbeating every party sitting across the table. Moreover,
the US still has to get a full backing from Israel to end operations. Mr. Trump’s mess is much bigger than it looks.