NEW DELHI :
UNDER fire over red flags raised
by two of its Commissioners over
the SIR process, the Election
Commission on Wednesday
asserted that differing views and
observations are a normal part
of deliberation in any institution
and all its orders carry full legal
sanction and follow established
statutory procedures.
In a statement, the EC also said
that not only the three
Commissioners, but every officer of the Commission is fully
authorised to give his suggestions to the Commission for
improving the electoral system.
The EC said any operational
queries or inputs raised by
Commission members during
draft stages are part of standard
administrative practice aimed
at safeguarding voter rights and
the suggestions given by the
Commissioners were for further
improving the electoral
processes.
The poll body’s statement
came after ‘The Indian Express’
reported that Election
Commissioners Sukhbir Singh
Sandhu and Vivek Joshi had
red flagged multiple issues,
including deletion of names, in
various States during the panIndia Special Intensive Revision
(SIR) of voters’ list, triggering
a massive political storm.
“All official orders, decisions
and administrative directions
issued by the Commission carry full legal sanctions and follow established statutory procedures under The Chief
Election Commissioner and
Other Election Commissioners
(Appointment, Conditions of
Service and Term of Office) Act,
2023.
“Differing views and observations are a normal part of
deliberation in any institution.
They are a part of the decisionmaking process before a final
decision is taken. Not only the
three Commissioners, but
every officer of the Commission
is fully authorised to give his
suggestions to the Commission
for improving the electoral system,” the statement said.
The newspaper also reported that the national rollout of
the SIR has been under the
supervision of all three
Commissioners but Sandhu
and Joshi have formally objected, on record, at least 14 times
over the last 10 months - four
times on a single day - to decisions taken and orders issued,
they say, without their knowledge.