Galgotias asked to leave AI Summit after showing Chinese robot as its own
    Date :19-Feb-2026

Galgotias asked to leave AI Summit
 
 
NEW DELHI :
 
PRIVATE university Galgotias has been asked to vacate its stall at the AI Impact Summit after a controversy over display of a made-in-China robotic dog as its own innovation. Following the controversy, IT Secretary S Krishnan said the Government does not want any exhibitor to showcase items that are not their own. “We do not want such exhibits to continue,” he said, after organisers asked Galgotias University to vacate its stall. Later in the day in a statement, Galgotias University apologised for the confusion created at the AI Impact Summit, stating that the person “manning the pavilion was ill-informed”.
 
“She was not aware of the technical origins of the products and in her enthusiasm of being on camera, gave factually incorrect information even though she was not authorised to speak to the press,” the university said. Stating that there was “no institutional intent to misrepresent this innovation,” the university said it remains firmly committed to academic integrity, transparency and responsible representations of its work.” It said it has vacated the premises “understanding the organiser’s sentiment”. The controversy erupted after Neha Singh, a professor of communications at the University, on Tuesday showed to ‘DD News’ a robotic dog Orion, saying it “has been developed by the Centre of Excellence at Galgotias University.”
 
As the video went viral, social media users highlighted that the robot was actually a Unitree Go2, manufactured by China’s Unitree Robotics and commonly used in research and education worldwide. As the episode snowballed into a controversy, the university was asked to vacate the stall. Facing backlash, both Galgotias and Singh on Wednesday said the robot was not a university creation and that the institution had never claimed otherwise. IT Secretary Krishnan, however, emphasised that the Government would not tolerate exhibits misrepresented as original creations. “If you mislead... We do not want a controversy (and) so we do not want a controversial agency... Whom people believe are exhibiting something which is not theirs,” he said.